If you’re willing to trade some capability for better fuel economy, the newest breed of more efficient crossover utilities is well represented by this 2013 Mazda CX-5. We picked it as our top Small Utility of the Year based on style, drivability, and its new fuel efficient SkyActiv technology. So, how well is it doing? Well, results from only a month and 1,056 miles are hardly conclusive. Still, 25.7 miles per gallon of regular is pretty good for around town duties. Clearly the CX-5’s 2-liter, 155-horsepower automatic drivetrain is geared for economy. Enough so that some staff and viewers have already labeled the CX-5 as slow. On the ride and handling side, the CX-5 is well above the norm. It handles twisty pavements like a true Mazda. The interior is modern, very business-like, but with enough soft materials to have a premium feel. So, if the CX-5 is the face of more responsible driving, it comes across pretty well.
2013 Mazda CX-5
Mazda has a tradition of going their own way. When rivals zig, they sort of zoom. That’s why the Tribute compact utility, actually a rebadged Ford Escape, never really fit. But that changed with the new CX-5. Now the CX-5 embodies everything we like about Mazda. So much so it is our Drivers’ Choice pick as Best in Class. Now let’s see if the CX-5 the right choice for you.
The 2013 CX-5 combines Mazda’s renown zoom-zoom driving appeal, with the new SKYACTIV approach of lighter weight and ultra-efficient power trains, in a mainstream compact crossover. The CX-5 promises the fun factor that Mazda is known for, plus fuel economy levels new for a non-hybrid CUV. By the numbers, the CX-5 is indeed light weight, weighing in at 3,200 pounds thanks to copious use of high strength steel. And, you feel it too, whether cruising on the highway or zigzagging around surburbia, the CX-5 has a nimbleness that is easy to love, along with a quietness we didn’t expect. The ride is never harsh, but there is a definitely tauter, sporty tilt.
The Skyactiv power-train likes to be revved high, which may be uncomfortable for some, but not for the typical Mazda fan. Starting with a high 13:1 compression ratio, direct-injection, variable valve timing 2-liter I4, dubbed the SKYACTIV-G, it delivers 155-horsepower and 150 pound feet of torque; power then flows to either the front or all four wheels via a 6-speed manual or automatic transmission. A turbo diesel is also in the offing.
We took our front wheel drive, manual equipped CX-5 Sport gaser to the track to see what it was capable of. And, unfortunately, the timed quarter mile is the one place sporty attitude and fuel economy don’t mix well. We’re not saying it’s underpowered, but it is definitely weak off the line. But, rev it like a Mazda, and power does sneak up on you. Still, 9.6-seconds to reach 60, and the quarter mile in 17.2-seconds at 82 miles-per-hour, are nothing to brag about.
But, Mazda should brag about making the CX-5 available with a positive and precise shifting manual gearbox, something most rivals avoid. It allowed us to make full use of the engine’s power. First through third feel pretty typical, but fifth and sixth are for highway use only. And, the payoff is indeed superior fuel economy without complication. Government Fuel Economy Ratings of 26-City and 35-Highway are impressive. We easily averaged 30.6-miles per gallon of Regular in mixed driving. Automatic numbers are 26-City and 32 Highway. The Energy Impact Score is very good for a utility at 11.4-barrels of oil consumed per year, and annual CO2 emissions of 5.1 tons.
And, back at the track, once we started scooting through the slalom course, we found zoom-zoom to still be in full effect. Driven at a mildly aggressive pace, the CX-5 feels light and is quick to turn in. The streetable suspension still warns you off if you push it too hard, but overall the CX-5 feels much more solid and controllable than the Tribute ever did. Brakes were also solid and very consistent, with stops from 60 averaging a just fine 129-feet.
Inside our Sport model CX-5, things are very straightforward, but well done. There’s good use of soft touch materials, but not so much that it loses the sporty feel. Seats are very comfortable; even people who rarely comment on seats loved them; and in the back as well, there’s ample legroom and it feels reasonably roomy all around. Controls are all refreshingly uncomplicated, including an old-school 4-speaker stereo that still sounds great and has us longing for the days when controls were knobs and buttons, no scrolling through menus required. Cargo space behind the split folding rear seats is a good 34.1-cubic feet, 64.8 with the seats down, and there’s lots of small item storage.
We really like the very aggressive, “soul of motion” styling theme of the CX-5, with a big trapezoidal grille up front and wind swept body lines down the sides. Overhangs are minimal, as the CX-5 is all wheelbase with 17-inch wheels standard. The back looks equally smooth, with large taillights creeping up into the fenders.
Like fuel economy, CX-5 pricing is also notable, starting at only $21,490 for our base Sport model. But, if you work your way up to Touring and Grand Touring models, you’ll be much closer to 30 grand. The 2013 Mazda CX-5 is the true Mazda crossover we’ve been waiting for. It’s stylish, with a well designed and roomy interior, and it exudes competent ride, handling, and braking. Yes, it is a little slow, but no one on our staff complained about getting over 30 MPG in a utility. So, if this is the future of the CUV, we bet a lot of you can get used to less reserve power, and spending less time at the pump, especially when you can still have so much fun.
Specifications
- Engine: 2-liter I4
- Horsepower: 155
- Torque: 150 lb-ft.
- 0-60 mph: 9.6 seconds
- 1/4 mile: 17.2 seconds at 82 mph
- EPA: 26 mpg city/ 35 mpg highway
- Energy Impact: 11.4 barrels oil/yr
- CO2 Emissions: 5.1 tons/yr
Long Term Updates
We picked the 2013 Mazda CX-5 as our Drivers’ Choice Best Small Utility for its practical size, expressive styling, fine handling, and advanced gas saving technology. On that last point, Mazda’s investment in SkyActiv technology, making gasoline powertrains run at peak efficiency, is paying off. We’ve logged 2400 miles in 2 months with a 2-liter I4 automatic combo and have 30.4 miles per gallon of regular to show for it. That compares to mid-20s on our long term Honda CR-V. Now, we will admit the CX-5 would lose any drag race with the CR-V, but once the road turns twisty the CX-5 lives up to Mazda’s other philosophy of “Zoom-Zoom” performance. Our staff finds the compact CX-5 to have plenty of interior room for most chores, but the voice-activated NAV system is a bit hard of hearing. Mazda recently announced a boost in production for the CX-5 and it’s easy to see why.
The all-new Mazda CX-5 compact crossover is our current Driver’s Choice Best Small Utility pick for, among other things, Mazda’s SkyActiv approach to improving fuel economy in traditional gas and diesel powertrains. So, we were prepared to accept a somewhat lethargic performance of its 155- horsepower 2.0-liter I4, automatic, all-wheel drive powertrain.
So, is it worth that tradeoff? Well, after 6,200 mostly urban miles in 4 months we’re averaging 28.9 miles per gallon of regular. That’s about 15-percent better than our long term Honda CR-V. So, SkyActiv does indeed pay off!
Once up to speed, the CX-5 is a commendable highway cruiser. The well laid out interior is user-friendly for passengers and cargo alike. Front seats are especially comfortable. The Blind Spot Monitoring system works well. One gripe, it’s hard to see the Start Button behind the wiper stalk. But, for size, versatility, handling, styling, and especially fuel economy, the Mazda CX-5 continues to be a winner.
We’re at 6 months and nearly 9,000 miles with this Mazda CX-5 compact crossover.
We applaud Mazda for adapting its new SkyActiv fuel saving technology to notoriously thirsty utilities. Our CX-5 delivers above average fuel economy for its class of 27.4 miles per gallon of regular.
But, the downside of SkyActiv is a lethargic 155-horsepower 2.0-liter I4 engine. The CX-5 can be a slug pulling away from a stop.
While all of our staff find the interior roomy, some think the front seats are a bit lumpy. But, we all agree that the CX-5 handles expertly, like a Mazda should.
Mazda’s fuel saving SkyActiv concept has gotten a lot of attention. It squeezes more miles per gallon without resorting to hybrid or electric hardware. Our 2013 CX-5 compact crossover uses the SkyActiv approach and so far we think it’s paying off.
After 8 months and nearly 10,000 mostly urban miles our CX-5 is averaging 27.3 miles per gallon. That’s 10-15% better than we’re seeing in the similarly sized Honda CR-V.
So we’re spending less time at the gas pump and more time doing other things small crossovers are not supposed to do well, like handling, and carrying more people and cargo than it should for its size.
What would make it even better? Well, more padding to the front seats and a smoother folding mechanism for the second row. But, don’t change the Bose audio system. It sounds sweet! And, the Mazda CX-5 surely is.
Getting better fuel economy without resorting to hybrid or alt-fuels is the goal behind Mazda’s SkyActiv concept. Through the use of high compression and gearing it boosts fuel economy about 10-15% over similar sized rivals. Our 2013 CX-5 compact crossover, the first model to fully embrace SkyActiv, is averaging an excellent 27.2 miles per gallon of Regular.
After 9 months and over 14,000 miles, we’ve gotten use to its less than jack rabbit acceleration. Made up for by very economical long distance cruising. And, true to Mazda’s mantra, it’s a pleasure to drive.
Two annoyances. The driver’s seat seems to wiggle like something is coming loose. And, the brakes are sometimes quite noisy. But, otherwise we are actively impressed with our SkyActiv Mazda CX-5.
If you’ve been keeping up with our long term Mazda CX-5 compact crossover with a 155-horsepower 2.0-liter SkyActiv powertrain, you know that its upside of class leading fuel economy is somewhat offset by anemic acceleration.
It’s still a fair tradeoff for what we think is an excellent handling, comfortable riding, practical living CUV.
After 10 months and nearly 16,000 miles our 2.0 CX-5 continues to impress with 26.6 miles per gallon of regular even after long periods of cold weather idling. Maybe that’s why the gas gauge almost never seems to move!
But, if you’re still wary about power, the 2014 Mazda CX-5 brings the welcome news of an optional engine, a 2.5-liter SkyActiv with 184-horsepower. It’s a nearly 20% boost that is readily noticeable, especially when passing. But, the best news is that fuel economy suffers only one mile per gallon and still beats rivals like CR-V and RAV4.
The CX-5 is a fine design and one small CUV that certainly should not be overlooked. If for fuel economy alone, it’s a winner.
This summer is something of a revolving garage door here at MotorWeek as long term models come and go. Going is our 2013 Mazda CX-5. After 13 months and 22,000 fault-free miles, we came away impressed by the first comprehensive use of the brand’s SkyActiv powertrain technology. Our test average 26.9 mile per gallon fuel economy was better than many rivals by about 10%. But, the price was lethargic acceleration from the 2.0-liter engine. That has been partially addressed as a larger 2.5-liter is now standard that boosts power with no loss of MPGs.
2024 Polestar 2
More Range And More Power For The Polestar 2
Volvo is well on their way to making the transition to an all-electric brand, but their sister-brand Polestar is already there. Now, we’ve spent lots of time in their all-wheel drive, five-door Polestar 2, having tested it in 2021, and a year later when a two-wheel drive version arrived. But, EV updates are coming quickly. So, let us be your guide for all that’s new with the Polestar 2.
While we are driving more EVs than ever, we’ve also been spending a lot of time recently circling back to ones we’ve previously tested. As in this new era of electrified vehicles, significant updates are arriving quickly, with R&D investments increasing and retrofitting them easier than ever. This is often done through software updates that can even be accomplished over the air. For 2024, the Polestar 2 has indeed gotten some software updates, but some physical ones as well.
Clearly aimed directly at Tesla’s Model 3 when it arrived; the Polestar 2’s build quality was vastly better, but range definitely came up short. So, addressing that was priority No. 1; and for ’24 the Polestar can travel up to 20% farther than before while consuming 9% less energy, and when it comes time to charge it back up, it can do that 34% faster too.
Range in the Single Motor version increases from a max of 270 to 320 miles thanks to a larger 82-kWh battery pack, and that solitary motor now powers the rear wheels, not the front wheels. It’s also bigger, coming in at 220 kW compared to the previous 170 kW front-wheel drive version, going from 231 to 299 horsepower.
Dual Motors keep the same 78-kWh battery, but still sees a boost from 260 to 276 miles and takes advantage of the larger rear motor for a new combined 310-kW output with 421 horsepower. Our test car has the added Performance Pack, which uses an additional 35 kW to deliver 455 horsepower and 546 lb-ft of torque, though max range drops to just 247 miles.
The new battery in rear-drive 2s will also charge faster, now accepting up to 205 kW for an 80% charge in 20 minutes; max for dual-motors stays at 155 kW, which puts an 80% charge at 34 minutes. Using 32 kWh of electricity per 100 miles, the Dual Motor earns a good efficiency rating.
The [Polestar] 2 has always been one of the most enjoyable EVs to drive, even more so now with that additional power coming from the rear motor.
Unfortunately, extremely cold temperatures kept us from seeing that increased range, as we were only on pace for about 194 miles in our test.
The 2 has always been one of the most enjoyable EVs to drive, even more so now with that additional power coming from the rear motor. And especially when equipped with the Performance Pack as it not only includes more power, but adds 20-inch forged wheels, upgraded brakes, and adjustable Ohlins Dual Flow Valve performance dampers. It greatly improves handling prowess without affecting ride quality, and is easily worth the $5,500 charge if you at all enjoy driving.
Even on a 20-degree track day there was plenty of grip through our handling course. No understeer or oversteer, and lots of feedback through the wheel. There was a nice, strong launch off the line that properly planted us firmly in the seat, and rocketed us to 60 in 4.5 seconds. Power delivery stayed pretty intense up until about 80 mph when there was a definite tapering off. Still, it was a 13.4-second quarter-mile at 102 mph; smooth, quiet, and stable the whole way.
When this car debuted, its Google-based infotainment setup was a novelty, but since then, more and more manufacturers are just “Googling it” so it doesn’t seem out of place at all. The wireless phone charger is easy to access, and there’s a great Harmon/Kardon sound system and panoramic sunroof to enhance the in-cabin experience. Exteriors have also been enhanced with a smooth grille insert and new wheel choices.
Hatchback practicality means 14.3 cu-ft of easy to access cargo space with split-folding seatbacks for longer items and expanding the space to 38.7 cu-ft. Plus, there’s even a sizeable storage bin up front under the hood.
Single Motor Polestar 2 pricing now starts at $51,300, with Dual Motors starting at $56,700; topping out at $64,400.
For a car manufacturer that hasn’t even been around for a decade yet, Polestar has kept itself busy, totally transforming their latest model in just a few years, making the 2024 Polestar 2 even more appealing. They are certainly off to a good start, and with a host of Polestars just over the horizon, including some all-important utility vehicles, this star will be shining even brighter.
Specifications
As Tested
- Motor Setup: Dual Motor
- Horsepower: 455
- 0-60 mph: 4.5 seconds
- EPA Range: 247 miles
- Efficiency : 32 kWh / 100 miles
- Battery Size: 78-kWh
- Torque: 546 lb-ft
- 1/4 Mile: 13.4 seconds at 102 mph
- MW Test Loop: ~ 194 miles
- Peak Charging Rate: 155 kW